Cathedral #1, 1969: Lithograph and screenprint on paper

  • Cathedral #1, 1969 by Roy Lichtenstein
    Cathedral #1, 1969
    Lithograph and screenprint on Special Arjomari paper, sheet: 123.2 x 82.5 cm
    Edition of 75; plus 10 AP, 1 RTP, 1 PPII, 3 GEL, 1 C
    ©The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein
    BACK TO: CATHEDRAL AND HAYSTACK SERIES
     
    Roy Lichtenstein’s Cathedral #1, 1969, is a defining work from his Cathedral series, translating the monumental architecture of Rouen Cathedral series into the visual language of Pop Art. Executed as a lithograph and screenprint on Special Arjomari paper, the composition is built from a dense field of yellow Ben-Day dots, overlaid with sweeping white gestures that fragment and obscure the underlying form. The cathedral itself becomes elusive, flickering between visibility and abstraction, as Lichtenstein replaces traditional modelling with a system of mechanical pattern and flat colour.
     
    The work operates through contrast, balancing precision and disruption. The rigid dot matrix suggests industrial reproduction, while the expressive white marks introduce a sense of movement and instability, breaking apart the architectural structure. Rather than presenting a fixed image, Lichtenstein creates a surface that feels active and shifting, echoing the changing light effects that fascinated Claude Monet, but reinterpreted through a distinctly modern, graphic lens. Produced in a controlled edition and published by Gemini G.E.L., the print reflects Lichtenstein’s growing interest in merging fine art references with the aesthetics of mass media.
  • "I'm excited about seeing things, and I'm interested in the way I think other people saw things." 

    - Roy Lichtenstein

    Within the Cathedral series, Lichtenstein pushes his use of Ben-Day dots beyond their origins in commercial printing. Enlarged and foregrounded, the dots no longer serve to create illusion but instead expose the mechanics of image construction itself. By breaking down an iconic subject into reproducible units, he questions ideas of originality and authorship, positioning the artwork at the intersection of historical reference and contemporary reproduction.